LAWS(DLH)-2001-2-43

OM WATI Vs. MOHAMMAD DIN

Decided On February 20, 2001
KRISHAN LAL Appellant
V/S
MOHAMMND DIN Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) All these appeals arise out of one accident involving a limited question of the extent of the insurer's liability and whether claimants in LPAs(59, 60 and 61/1993) were liable to forego their 30% share of compensation because they had failed to plead driver and owner and insurer of the car involved in the accident. LPAs (59, 60 and 61/1993) are filed by claimants questioning forfeiture of their 30% share of compensation amount and the other set of appeals (nos. 90, 91 and 92/1993) are preferred by the Insurance Company pleading limited liability up to Rs. 50,000.00.

(2.) One Sanjeev Kumar was driving his car no. HRH-24 with two others Shiv Singh and Sat Pal on 27/5/1979 when it was hit by a truck no. DLL-5052 coming from opposite direction. All the three sustained injuries and died in the process. Their LRs filed claim petitions which were resisted by the Insurance Company on the plea of its limited liability of Rs. 50.000.00. The company took the plea in its written statement but did not seek framing of any issue on this. Nor did it place on record any original copy, carbon copy or photocopy of the insurance policy alongwith or immediately thereafter. It also failed to call upon the insured to produce the original copy. It, however, produced an attested copy through its Branch Manager, R.K. Khanna (RW-1) who testified that this was the true copy of original policy no. 459680287 covering vehicle no. DLL no. 5052 for a period from 27/2/1979 to 26/2/1980 for a third party risk of Rs. 50,000.00. He also stated that the original policy was issued under his signatures. He did not produce any other document or record to show that the company had not charged any extra premium from the insurer.

(3.) MACT relied upon his evidence and held the company's liability limited to Rs. 50,000.00. It also found that accident had occurred because of contributory negligence of drivers of both vehicles and accordingly apportioned 70% liability on the truck owner/driver and insurer and 30% on the car owner/insurer.