LAWS(DLH)-2001-3-70

SHISH RAM Vs. STATE

Decided On March 02, 2001
SHISH RAM Appellant
V/S
STATE OF DELHI Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Admit.

(2.) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the point involved in this petition is very short and the same can be disposed of at this stage itself. This revision petition is directed against the judgment and order dated 19/9/2000 passed by the court of Sh.R.K.Gaubha Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi upholding the conviction of the petitioner under Section 16/1 (1A) read with Section 7 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (for short PFA Act) for violation of S. 2 (,ia)(a) (b) (c) (j) & (m) and the sentence of R.I. for one year with fine of Rs. 5000.00, in default further Sl for 6 months. Learned counsel for the petitioner has preferred not to challenge the conviction of the petitioner but has only prayed for suitable directions for commuting the sentence of RI to fine under clause (c) of Section 433 CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE. It is argued that in this case samples in question were lifted on 30/09/1988 when the petitioner was young boy of 19 years and absolutely clean antecedents and the petitioner has suffered the pain and agony of trial for more than 12 years and that the petitioner is in custody for the last more than 5 months and that the sample was found adulterated because of the presence of paddy husk and rice starch. Reliance is placed on two Supreme Court decisions N. Sukumaran Nair v. Food Inspector Navelikara, (1996) 2 PFA Cases 21 wherein it was held:-

(3.) In this case, admittedly, the offence was committed more than 12 years ago ; in the sample nothing injurious to health was found and the petitioner has already undergone a sentence of 4-1/2 months RI. In view of the peculiar facts of this case, I am inclined to direct that the sentence of the petitioner be commuted to the period already Undergone and the sentence, fine of Rs. 5,000.00 is enhanced to Rs. 10,000.00. Let the fine be deposited within two weeks and on the fine being deposited, the State Government may formalise the matter by passing an appropriate order under clause (c) of Section 433 CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE.