LAWS(DLH)-2020-10-36

JITENDER PRASAD Vs. STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

Decided On October 13, 2020
Jitender Prasad Appellant
V/S
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The appellant has filed the present appeal impugning a judgment dated 16.07.2016 passed by ASJ-01, Rohini District Courts, whereby the appellant was convicted for committing aggravated penetrative sexual assault on a child victim - an offence punishable under Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (hereafter the 'POCSO Act'). He was also convicted under Sections 376/342 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter the 'IPC').

(2.) The appellant also seeks to challenge the order on sentence dated 19.07.2016, whereby the appellant was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for a period of fourteen years along with a fine of Rs. 5,000/- for committing the offence punishable under Section 6 of the POCSO Act and in default of payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment for a further period of three months. The appellant was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year for the offence punishable under Section 342 of the IPC with a fine of Rs. 1,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment for a further period of one week. All sentences were to run concurrently. Additionally, the ld. ASJ directed the Secretary, DLSA, North West Dist., to grant compensation of Rs. 2,00,000/- to the child victim for her welfare and rehabilitation.

(3.) The appellant was prosecuted pursuant to registration of an FIR bearing FIR No. 577/2014 under Sections 376/342 of the IPC, registered with PS Keshav Puram. The said FIR was registered on 07.09.2014 at the instance of the mother of the victim. The victim's mother stated that, at about 8:00 pm, she sent the prosecutrix - a girl aged about eleven years, to the shop (downstairs) to call her grandfather for dinner and after ten-fifteen minutes, her daughter came back weeping. She stated that the prosecutrix informed her that the accused had pulled the prosecutrix into a room and bolted the door. He made her lie on the ground. She stated that the accused then gagged the mouth of the child victim with his hand and raped her. She stated that she also noticed blood stains on the clothes of the prosecutrix. After coming to know of the alleged incident, she went downstairs to accost the assailant along with the prosecutrix who pointed towards the accused as the person who raped her. She stated that the accused managed to run away on seeing her and the prosecutrix.