(1.) This hearing has been done by video conferencing.
(2.) This is a first appeal against the order dated 10th February, 2020 by which the ld. ADJ/ Executing Court has held that the alternate relief of monetary payment is granted in favour of the Decree Holder/Plaintiff i.e. the Appellant herein (hereinafter 'decree holder'), as more than two years have been passed since the decree for specific performance was passed and the same has not reached any conclusion.
(3.) The brief background of this case is that a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell and purchase dated 18th January, 2012 was filed by the Appellant herein against the Respondent. The said suit was decreed in favour of the decree holder, by the ld. ADJ, vide judgement/decree dated 16th May, 2017. The operative portion of the said decree reads as under: -