LAWS(DLH)-2020-2-170

STATE Vs. RAJU

Decided On February 07, 2020
STATE Appellant
V/S
RAJU Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The petitioner has filed the present leave to appeal against a judgment dated 10.01.2017 rendered by Special Judge (POCSO Act)/ASJ-01 (Central Delhi) Tis Hazari Courts, whereby the respondent was acquitted of the charges of committing offences punishable under Sections 363/354/354A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and Section 10 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act).

(2.) The said proceedings arose from the FIR No. 130/2014 under Sections 308/323/354B/34 of the IPC, registered with PS Prasad Nagar. The case of the prosecution is that on 15.03.2014, on the basis of information received from one Brij Mohan, police officials reached at House No. 16/226 I, Bapa Nagar, Delhi where they found the respondent alongwith a young child 'R' (her name is withheld for protecting her identity). Initially, R claimed herself to be the daughter of the respondent, however, on verification, it was found that she was not his daughter. Thereafter, the child was taken to her father and her statement led to the registration of the FIR in question (FIR No. 130/14).

(3.) The victim's statement was recorded under Section 164 of the CrPC, wherein she stated that on the day of choti holi, she was going to her father. On her way, she met her father's friend Raju (accused/respondent) who took her to Anand Parbat in an auto- rickshaw. She stated that he took her to a room in his house and closed the door of the said room. Thereafter, he started misbehaving with her and touched her inappropriately at her private part (galat jagah;"bathroom ki jagah par haath laga rahe the"). She raised an alarm and thereafter, his nephew came and asked the accused to leave her or he would call the police. Both accused and his nephew had an altercation thereafter and then, the said bhaiyya called the police. After the police arrived at the spot, the accused asked the victim to tell the police that he was her father otherwise he won't drop her to her father's place. She stated that under fear of this threat, she told the police that the accused was her father. Thereafter, the police took the accused to the police station.