LAWS(DLH)-2010-2-94

ASHOK KUMAR ALIAS BUDDHA Vs. STATE

Decided On February 18, 2010
ASHOK KUMAR ALIAS BUDDHA Appellant
V/S
STATE Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Lest there be any confusion, we may note that the appellant is named Ashok Kumar. There is another Ashok Kumar who has appeared as PW-2. Thus, we would be referring to the appellant not by his name Ashok Kumar but as accused No.1. We would be referring to the witness Ashok Kumar as Ashok Kumar PW-2.

(2.) As per the prosecution, accused No.1 and his juvenile co-accused Rajan waylaid Gautam near the Eastern End of Railway Station Badli. The intention was to rob him. When Gautam resisted, accused No.1 caught him and co- accused Rajan stabbed Gautam. They removed some money from Gautam's pocket and fled. Unknown to them, Ashok Kumar PW-2 had watched the incident.

(3.) It is the case of the prosecution that Rajan was apprehended at the instance of Ashok Kumar PW-2 who used to see Rajan loitering around at the railway station. Ashok Kumar PW-2 lives in Samaipur Badli itself and either works or runs a shop in Samaipur Badli.