REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

P.L.GUPTA Appellant

V/S

CBI Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

R.C. SABHARWAL VS. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION [REFERRED TO]
NAGENDRA NATH BORA LIKHIRAM COMMISSIONER OF HILLS DIVISION AND APPEALS ASSAM RAFIULLAH KHAN VS. COMMISSIONER OF HILLS DIVISION AND APPEALS ASSAM:BHANURAM PAGU:BHANURAM PEGU:AMULYA PRASAD CHALIHA [REFERRED TO]
NIBARAN CHANDRA BAG VS. MAHENDRA NATH CHUGHUL DECEASED AFTER HIM HIS HEIR AND LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE [REFERRED TO]
SARPANCH LONAND GRAMPANCHAYAT VS. RAMGIRI GOSAVI [REFERRED TO]
MARUTI BALA RAUT VS. DASHRATH BABU WATHARE [REFERRED TO]
BABHUTMAL RAICHAND OSWAL VS. LAXMIBAI R TARTA [REFERRED TO]
JAGIR SINGH VS. RANBIR SINGH [REFERRED TO]
VISHESH KUMAR VS. SHANTI PRASAD [REFERRED TO]
KHALIL AHMED BASHIR AHMED VS. TUFELHUSSEIN SAMASBHAJI SARANGPURWALA [REFERRED TO]
M C MEHTA VS. KAMAL NATH [REFERRED TO]
RANJEET SINGH VS. RAVI PRAKASH [REFERRED TO]
DHARAMBIR KHATTAR VS. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The above petition and many more petitions have been filed by litigants against the orders of Special Judge framing charge for the offences under Prevention of Corruption Act coupled with or without charges for offences under IPC.

(2.) Some of the petitions were filed originally under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, some were filed as Revision Petitions and were converted as Writ Petitions at the request of the parties, and some Writs were filed after dismissal of Revision Petition.

(3.) In Dharambir Khattar v. Central Bureau of Investigation, 159 (2009) DLT 636, the Bench of Dr. S. Muralidhar J. after considering the provisions of Section 19(3)(c) of Prevention of Corruption Act and after considering the legal position and after scanning through various judgments of Supreme Court had observed as under:

Click here to view full judgment.

P L GUPTA Vs. CBI

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address