ALOK KUMAR DUBEY Vs. STATE OF C.G

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD. Office has raised certain defaults. The defaults are formal. The same are condoned. HEARD on admission.

(2.) THIS petition is directed against the order dated 1st December, 2006, passed in Criminal Revision No. 343/2006 by the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Bilaspur (CG), whereby the learned A.S.J., while dismissing the revision of the Petitioners, has confirmed the order dated 21.9.2006, passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Bilaspur in Criminal Case No. 432/2006, by which, the said Court had framed charges under Section 498-A/34 IPC against all the Petitioners.

(3.) LEARNED Counsel for the Petitioners argues that prima facie there does not appear to be any material against Petitioners No. 2 to 5, therefore, they should be discharged. He also argues that there was no prima facie material even against Petitioner No. 1 and the charges framed against him are also not sustainable. His submission is that the trial Court as well as the revisional Court erred in law in framing the charges under Section 498-A/34 IPC against all the Petitioners, which should be interfered by this Court.