(1.) This is an insurer's appeal under Section 30(a) of the Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 (for short "the Act of 1923") against the order dated 15.04.2011 passed by Commissioner, Workmen's Compensation-cum-Labour Court, Rajnandgaon (for short "the Commissioner"), in case No. 42/W.C.Act/2008/non-fatal, thereby granting the application for compensation filed by respondent No. 1/claimant. The facts in nutshell, necessary for adjudication of the appeals, are as under:
(2.) This appeal was admitted for hearing on 11.10.2011 on the following substantial question of law:
(3.) Shri Sourabh Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the appellant would submit that the injury sustained by the respondent No. 1/claimant is a scheduled injury prescribed in Schedule I, part II, item No. 25 of the Act of 1923 and resultant loss of earning capacity according to said schedule would be only 40% and, therefore, learned Commissioner has committed a legal error in holding the loss of earning capacity of respondent No. 1 as 70% and, therefore, the amount of compensation be suitably reduced holding loss of earning capacity as 40%.