(1.) The petitioners have questioned the legality and validity of the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Raipur in Complaint Case No. 2670/2015 dtd. 30/11/2015, whereby cognizance has been taken of a complaint filed by the respondent against the petitioners for commission of offence punishable under Ss. 191, 192, 193, 196, 120-B read with Sec. 34 of IPC.
(2.) It is undisputed that the petitioner No.1 is the husband of the respondent and their marriage was solemnized on 23/5/2010.
(3.) The facts of the present case in a nutshell are that barely after two months of marriage, on account of a certain dispute, the respondent left her matrimonial house and thereafter, the petitioner No.1 made a complaint making imputation on the character of the respondent to the President of his community on 8/10/2010 and on 16/6/2011, he filed a petition for dissolution of marriage, whereas the respondent filed Misc. Judicial Case No. 8/2012 under Sec. 125 of Cr.P.C. for grant of maintenance before the Family Court, Raipur. In a proceeding under MJC No. 8/2012, the respondent examined herself as witness No. 1, whereas petitioner No. 1 examined himself along with two other witnesses as witness No. 1 to 3 respectively. Vide order dtd. 18/6/2014; the learned Family Court passed the order in favour of the respondent in a proceeding initiated under Sec. 125 of Cr.P.C.