LAWS(CHH)-2023-7-76

YOGESH TIWARI Vs. STATE OF C.G.

Decided On July 07, 2023
YOGESH TIWARI Appellant
V/S
STATE OF C.G. Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This criminal appeal under Sec. 374(2) of the CrPC is directed against the impugned judgment of conviction and order of sentence dtd. 18/2/2013 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sarangarh, in Sessions Trial No. 99/2000, by which the appellants herein have been convicted for offence under Sec. 302 of the IPC and sentenced them to undergo imprisonment for life and fine of Rs.25,000.00 each, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo simple imprisonment for one year.

(2.) Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that deceased Yogita Tiwari was married with Yogesh Tiwari (A-1) in the year 1996. After marriage, both spouses led a peaceful life, but after some time the deceased was being tortured for demand of dowry and due to this harassment and cruelty, she was feeling apprehension in her mind. Whenever she used to go to her parental house, she states about the cruel treatment given by the appellants. On 12/12/1998, father of the deceased had gone to meet his daughter where he was ill-treated by in-laws. Seeing the humiliated treatment by her in-laws, she starting weeping and embraced her father that her life was danger and most probably, it would be last meeting between them and thereafter her father returned back to his village. On 8/1/1999 dead body of the deceased found lying in a burnt condition in kitchen of her matrimonial house. Sanjay Dubey (PW-11) has lodged merg intimation vide Ex.P-13 and on the basis of merg intimation, FIR was registered vide Ex.P-16. Spot map was prepared by the investigating officer vide Ex.P-14. Dead body of deceased Yogita was sent for postmortem to Primary Health Centre, Sarangarh vide Ex.P-17, where postmortem was conducted by Dr. Jagannath Sharma (PW-9) vide Ex.P-8 and noticed following features at the time of conducting post mortem examination:-

(3.) Dr. Jagannath Sharma (PW-9) has opined that death is caused by burn. No definite opinion regarding mode of death, whether suicidal, homicidal or accidental can be given. Time since death is within twelve to forty eight (48) hours prior to commencement of post mortem. Appellant-Ramkumar Tiwari was arrested vide arrest memo Ex.P-21, appellant-Shivkumari Tiwari was arrested vide arrest memo Ex.P-22 and appellant-Yogesh Tiwari was arrested vide arrest memo Ex.P-23. After completion of investigation, charge-sheet was filed before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sarangarh, who in turn, committed the case to the Court of Session, Raigarh, from where the Additional Sessions Judge, Sarangarh received the case on transfer for trial. The accused/appellant abjured the guilt and entered into defence.