PYARELAL CHOUDHARY Vs. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The petitioner who was working as PTI Teacher with the Government Higher Secondary School, BALCO. He retired from service w.e.f. 30/6/2022, after the completion of age of superannuation ie., 62 years.

(2.) The petitioner's grievance in brief is this, that he is entitled to get annual increment on 1st July every year, but since the petitioner has been retired from service on 30/6/2022, his annual increment from 1/7/2022 to 31/7/2022 has not been considered. He would further submits that he has already worked for the entire period, he is entitled for grant of annual increment. He would further submits that similar issued was dealt by Hon'ble Division Bench of M.P. High Court in WA No. 363/2020 wherein the Hon'ble Division Bench has held as under.

(3.) The Hon'ble Division Bench of Madras High Court in the case of P. Ayyamperumal v. The Registrar decided on 15/9/2017 in WP No. 15732 of 2017 has held in para 6 and 7 which read as under.