(1.) BY this petition, under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner assails the validity and legality of order dated 1-7-2003 (Annexure P-3) by which it was directed to recover an amount of Rs. 64,713/- from the petitioner. The petitioner also challenges the order dated 4-9-2003 (Annexure P-4) passed by the respondent No. 2 by which the said authority refused to entertain the appeal filed by the petitioner against the order dated 1-7-2003.
(2.) THE facts, in nutshell, as projected by the petitioner, are that the petitioner was working as Godown Keeper and was posted at Co-operative Marketing, Sakti. On the basis of the instruction of the Assistant Registrar, Co-operative Societies, the auditor submitted special report of 1984-85 by mentioning that the petitioner as well as other office bearers of the society caused loss to the society. After receipt of the audit report, the Deputy Registrar, by order dated 1-12-1988 appointed the respondent No. 3 as Enquiry Officer and directed him to make enquiry regarding the allegations levelled against the petitioner as well as other office bearers of the society. THE respondent No. 3 submitted his enquiry report on 30-1-1992 (Annexure P-2). In the said report, it has been specifically mentioned that the allegations made in the audit report are baseless and the same are based on conjunctures and surmises.
(3.) I have heard learned Counsel appearing for the parties, perused the pleadings and documents appended thereto.