DILEEP AND SHAMBHOORAM Vs. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) CHALLENGE in this appeal is to the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 16.1.1991 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Kanker, in Sessions Trial Nos. 200/89 and 202/89, whereby and whereunder learned Additional Sessions Judge after holding the appellants guilty for the offence punishable under Sections 363, 366 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code sentenced them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years, rigorous imprisonment for four years and rigorous imprisonment for five years, respectively.

(2.) CONVICTION is challenged on the ground that without there being any iota of evidence, the trial Court has convicted and sentenced the appellants as aforementioned and thereby committed illegality.

(3.) I have heard learned Counsel for the parties, perused the judgment impugned and record of the trial Court.