K. TIRUPATHI RAJU Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The petitioner herein states the grievance against the order dated 07.11.2017 (Annexure-A) for rejection of his application for grant of quarrying lease.

(2.) It is not in dispute that several similar nature writ petitions have been considered and allowed by this Court while disapproving the similar nature endorsements and while restoring the applications for reconsideration, including a batch of writ petitions led by W.P.No.43235/2017 decided on 11.04.2018, wherein this Court has, inter alia, observed as under:

(3.) Perusal of the record makes out that in this matter in fact the approach of the authorities concerned in taking the petitioner as being ineligible was disapproved by an earlier order dated 11.04.2017, as passed in W.P.No.9290/2017, whereby the authorities were directed to collect necessary clearances/reports from the departments concerned and consider the prayer of the petitioner for execution of lease deed. The authorities concerned have, however, chosen to reject the application again, while taking the petitioner ineligible for want of NOC before 11.08.2016. Even from the other aspects indicated in the impugned order dated 07.11.2017, it is difficult to cull out a definite and categorical finding as to why the application of the petitioner was being rejected.