(1.) This appeal by the plaintiffs is preferred against the judgment and decree dated 19th June, 1976 passed by the learned Principal Civil Judge, Bangalore District, in Original Suit No. 42/73 dismissing the suit filed by the appellants for partition and separate possession of their shares in the suit-schedule properties. Parties in this judgment will be referred to with reference to the ranking assigned to them in the trial Court.
(2.) The 1 st defendant is the father of the plaintiffs. The 2nd defendant is the brother of the 1st defendant. Defendants 3 and 4 are the alienees. The 5th defendant is a tenant of a portion in item No. 1 of the suit-schedule property. The trial Court, on the basis of the pleadings of the parties framed the following issues:
(3.) Having regard to the contentions urged before us, the following points arise for consideration : (1) Whether suit item Nos 2 to 4 are the joint family properties ? (2) Whether the partition effected by defendants 1 and 2 is fair ? (3) Whether the alienation made by Defendant No. 1 evidenced by Exhibit P-3 is binding on the shares of the plaintiffs ? If so, whether the alienation evidenced by Exhibit P-8 effected by Defendant-3 in favour of Defendant-4 is binding on the plaintiffs ? (4) Whether the Court had jurisdiction to entertain the suit ? (5) What relief ? Point No. (1) :