K.PRITHVIRAJ RAI Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This appeal emerges out of an unfortunate litigation between some members of the Mangalore Bar Association for selection of the members of the committee and the office bearers of such association. In our view, this litigation could have been avoided.

(2.) On December 17, 2016, there had been an election for selection of the members of the committee and the office bearers of the Mangalore Bar Association. The election was peacefully held. There was no problem insofar as the committee members of the association. However, there was a tie between Mr.M.R.Ballal and Mr.S.P.Chengappa for the post of President. The provision is to hold a lottery. Instead of lottery, there was re-election and Chengappa was elected.

(3.) The Hon'ble Single Judge by the order impugned accepted, partially, the plea of the writ petitioner and set aside the re-election to the post of the President and directed to hold a lottery between Mr.M.R.Ballal and Mr.S.P.Chengappa.