(1.) THE Insurance Company has preferred this appeal under Sec. 30 (1) of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, for short the Act, aggrieved by the order/award dated 30th September, 2002 of the Commissioner for Workmen's compensation, Bangalore Sub-division No. 2, Bangalore, in case no. WCI/b-21. S. S. C/cr-131/2000, insofar as it relates to the quantum of compensation.
(2.) THE 1 st respondent employed as a driver by the 2nd respondent, the owner of the motor vehicle bearing lorry registration certificate No. KA-02-6688 and insured by the appellant, in the course of employment, met with motor vehicle accident involving the insured vehicle on 6-10-2000 and sustained grievous injury in the nature of crush injury to the right limb from knee to the foot. The 1st respondent claimed Rs. 4,00,000/- as compensation which was adjudicated by the Commissioner under the Act.
(3.) THE petition was not opposed by the owner of the vehicle but was opposed by the appellant-insurer. In order to prove the nature of the injury sustained and the alleged loss of earning capacity, the 1st respondent examined a doctor by name S. N. Patil, as a witness. This witness deposed that the percentage of disability was 40% to the right limb and 20% to the whole body. In addition, the witness stated that the 1st respondent cannot discharge the duties of a driver. The Commissioner, having regard to the material on record and appreciating the evidence both oral and documentary, recorded a factual finding that the 1st respondent at the time of the accident was aged 30 years, drawing monthly wage of Rs. 3,500/- and suffered 100% loss of earning capacity and accordingly, awarded compensation of Rs. 2,49,276/- with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from 6-11-2000 upto the date of payment, by order dated 30-9-2002.