MUNI AKHAYYAMMA Vs. MATSTRY PAPAIAH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS is a revision petition preferred by the Petitioner -Plaintiff against the order of the learned Subordinate Judge, Civil Station, Bangalore, Allowing Respondent -Defendant's application, I. A. No. T. for the amendment of the second issue in Original Suit No. 117 of 1954.

(2.) THE Petitioner is the Plaintiff ind the respondent the defendant in the lower Court. Plaintiff's suit was for the recovery of about Rs. 8,931/ -due under a hypothecation deed executed by the what the Defendant has stated in para 2 of written in statement The learned Subordinate judge framed the following issue covering this point:

(3.) THE learned Counsel for the Petitioner also not dispute this point. What he has pleaded is that the attestation to the document is not valid. We also see nothing on the face of the document to doubt its genuineness or the attestation it, bears, The document Is attested by two witnesses:.