(1.) This Civil Revision Petition under Section 50 of the Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') is preferred against the order dated 24-7-1985 passed by the Learned 12th Additional Small Cause Judge, Bangalore, in H. R.C. No. 2196 of 1982.
(2.) The respondent-landlady filed a Petition for eviction of the petitioner from the schedule premises on the grounds falling under Section 21(a)(h) and (p) of the Act. The case of the respondent-landlady was that she had no income except Rs. 300/- per month which she was getting by way of rent; that the same was not sufficient to meet the expenses of the family ; that in order to maintain the family it was necessary to augment the income of the family ; therefore, she intended to carry on business of grinding and also selling vegetables in the schedule premises ; that the petitioner-tenant was in arrears of rent and he was a defaulter ; that he had acquired alternative suitable accommodation. The petitioner-tenant disputed the case pleaded by the respondent-landlady.
(3.) On the basis of the evidence on record, the Trial Court has come to the conclusion that no case is made out under Section 21(1)(a) of the Act ; that the respondent-landlady has established that she bona fide and reasonably requires the premises for running the business ; that greater hardship would be caused to her if no order of eviction is passed ; that the petitioner has acquired alternative suitable premises. Accordingly, the Trial Court has passed an order of eviction under Section 21(1)(h) and (p) of the Act.