LAWS(KAR)-2025-3-15

S.SAVITHRAMMA Vs. S.PADMAVATHAMMA

Decided On March 26, 2025
S.Savithramma Appellant
V/S
S.PADMAVATHAMMA Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The appellant Smt. S. Savitharamma has preferred this Regular First Appeal under Sec. 96 read with Order 41 Rule 1 CPC, being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dtd. 7/2/2020 passed in O.S.No. 2653/2006 by the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Anekal, Bangalore Rural District, dismissing the suit for partition and separate possession.

(2.) Heard the learned Senior Counsel Shri K.G. Raghavan representing the learned counsel Sri Shreeram T Nayak for the appellant / plaintiff. Further, we have heard the learned counsel Sri V.N Shankar Gowda and Learned counsel Sri Murali B.D. representing Respondent No.1; learned counsel Shri N.K. Ramesh who is representing Respondent nos.9 to 12 and Shri Prakash B.N. representing Respondent nos. 7 (A) and (C) and Respondent No.8. Respondent Nos. 2, 5(A), 5(B) and 11 remain absent and unrepresented.

(3.) The facts of the case leading up to this appeal are as under: