(1.) Petitioner No. 1, a partnership firm called M/s. SSA Constructions (the mortgagor-borrower), and Petitioner No. 2, its managing director and alleged surety, obtained various loan facilities from Respondent No. 1, the mortgagee creditor bank. They have filed this writ petition, challenging the dismissal of I.A. No. 674/2014 in O.A. No. 963/2011 by the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT), Bangalore, in an order dtd. 22/5/2015. In their application, the petitioners requested that the properties of Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 be included for issuing a recovery certificate under Sec. 19 of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 (RDDBFI Act).
(2.) Respondent No. 1 had approved credit facilities for the petitioners and M/s. SSA Constructions (Defendant No. 3 in O.A. 963/2011, not listed here). The properties of the petitioners, co-borrowers, and guarantors were offered as security for the repayment of these loans.
(3.) On 8/3/2007, the term loan limit was reduced from Rs.200.00 lakhs to Rs.60.00 lakhs, and the properties of Respondent Nos. 2 and 3, which the petitioners now want to include, were released.