LAWS(KAR)-2014-10-116

MUNIRAJU Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Decided On October 27, 2014
Muniraju Appellant
V/S
STATE OF KARNATAKA Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD the learned counsel for the petitioner. Perused the records.

(2.) THE petitioner has sought for quashing of the FIR registered in Crime No. 92/2014 by the Anugondanahalli Police for the offence punishable under Section 143, 147, 148, 342, 504, 506(b), 427, 395 r/w. 149 of IPC and Sections 3 & 25 of Arms Act, pending on the file of the learned Civil Judge & JMFC, Hoskote Taluk.

(3.) ON plain reading of the complaint, as rightly contended by the complainant that there are some small interpolations but the name of the petitioner is specifically mentioned stating that on the date of the incident, the petitioner herein who had been threatening the respondent No. 2 with dire consequences of killing him and on that particular date, he came along with 60 persons in four tractors and one JCB, demolished the house of the second respondent and caused loss to an extent of Rs. 5 lakhs. The complainant (respondent No. 2) herein peeped through the window of his house and saw that this petitioner was holding a pistol in his hand and threatened the respondent No. 2 with dire consequences of killing him and other persons who accompanied the petitioner were also holding deadly weapons like longs and choppers and they also threatened him with dire consequences of killing him. Though the FIR does not disclose the registration number of the Tractor or JCB and also the names of the other accused persons, but nevertheless there is a specific allegation of demolition of the house of the complainant and causing loss of Rs. 5 lakhs and also threatening him with dire consequents of killing by showing pistol. It is submitted that the petitioner is a Licence holder of pistol, but that has to be ascertained during the course of investigation and to find out as to whether the said weapon is used for commission of any offence or not. At this threshold stage, it is not fair enough to quash the entire proceedings when the allegations made in the FIR are sufficient to constitute the offences alleged.