LAWS(KAR)-2013-6-4

CHIKKACHOWDAPPA Vs. S.M. SEETHARAM

Decided On June 14, 2013
Chikkachowdappa Appellant
V/S
S.M. Seetharam Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. The learned Counsel for the respondent has remained absent even though the matter was adjourned several times to enable the counsel to appear and contest the case.

(2.) The petitioner herein was the accused on a complaint by the respondent, alleging an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (Hereinafter referred to as the 'NI Act', for brevity).

(3.) The facts of the case are as follows:-