(1.) HEARD the learned counsel representing the parties. It is the case of appellant that he is the member of Temple Committee. By the impugned order vide Annexure -A dated 14.8.2013 passed by the 1st respondent -Rajya Dharmika Parishat, he has been removed from the membership of the Committee constituted under the Karnataka Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments Act, 1997 (for short "Act").
(2.) SRI . Vyasa Rao, learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that the order passed at Annexure -A is without following due procedure of law and without notice and as such, the same is non est in law and accordingly, sought for setting aside the same.