(1.) HEARD the learned counsel representing the parties. It is the case of appellant that he is the member of Temple Committee. By the impugned order vide Annexure -A dated 26.8.2013 passed by the 1st respondent -Rajya Dharmika Parishat, he has been removed from the membership of the Committee constituted under the Karnataka Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments Act, 1997 (for short "Act").
(2.) SRI . Mahadeva R.K., learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that the order passed at Annexure -A is without following due procedure of law and without notice and as such, the same is non est in law and accordingly, sought for setting aside the same.
(3.) Where the Rajya Dharmika Parishat or the Zilla Dharmika Parishat as the case may be proposes to take action under sub -sec. (1) it shall frame the charge against the chairman and give him an opportunity of meeting such charge or testing the evidence adduced against the charge and of adducing evidence in favour of the Committee including a member or hereditary trustee; and the order of dissolution shall state every charge framed against the committee including a member of hereditary trustee, explanation offered by the Committee including a member or hereditary trustee and the finding on such charge together with the reasons therefore. 3. Pending enquiry under sub -sec. (2) the Rajya Dharmika Parishat or Zilla Dharmika Parishat as the case may be may suspend the committee including a member or hereditary trustee and appoint an administrator in accordance with S. 29.On perusal, it is seen that there is noncompliance of Section 28 of the Act while passing the impugned order by the respondent, the same is set aside. It is for the respondents to do the needful in the matter. Appeal is allowed accordingly. The Learned Additional Government Advocate is permitted to file memo of appearance within four weeks from today.