(1.) PETITIONERS are defendants 38 and 39 in the trial Court. They have called in question the order dated 31.01.2012 passed on LA. No.11 in O.S. No.38/2011 on the file of the Pri. Civil Judge and concurrent charge of I Addl. Civil Judge, Mangalore, Dakshina Kannada.
(2.) PLAINTIFFS 1 to 77 have filed a suit for declaration declaring that defendants 1 and 2 have ceased to be trustees of defendant No.3- Temple and for injunction.
(3.) THE trial Court, after considering the averments in the application, has found that defendants 1 to 37 have not raised any contention with regard to maintainability of the suit and the Temple is not a Hindu Religious' and Charitable institution, but, it is governed by Trustees appointed under Board order No.3635 dated 03.12.1938. As such, defendant No.3 - Temple does not come under the ambit of Section 92 of CPC. and accordingly, rejected LA. No. 11, as against which, this petition is filed.