LAWS(KAR)-2012-12-199

DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, NEKRTC, RAICHUR DIVISION, THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, NEKRTC, CENTRAL OFFICE, SARIGE SADANA, OPP. KBN HOSPITAL, MAIN ROAD, GULBARGA, BY ITS CHIEF LAW OFFICER Vs. CHANNABASAPPA, S/O. HANUMAPPA

Decided On December 03, 2012
Divisional Controller, Nekrtc, Raichur Division, Through Its Managing Director, Nekrtc, Central Office, Sarige Sadana, Opp. Kbn Hospital, Main Road, Gulbarga, By Its Chief Law Officer Appellant
V/S
Channabasappa, S/O. Hanumappa Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS writ petition is directed against the award in Ref. No. 109/2008 dated 19.11.2010 on the file of the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Gulbarga, whereby the Labour Court has set aside the order of dismissal of the respondent -workman and has directed his reinstatement without any backwages. The Labour Court has further directed continuity of service by withholding two future annual increments with cumulative effect. The respondent had been working with the petitioner -Corporation as a Driver. A charge memo was issued to the respondent alleging that he had remained unauthorisedly absent for duty from 12.10.2003 to 6.2.2004. The workman has filed his reply denying the charges. The disciplinary authority after holding an enquiry has held that petitioner has committed misconduct by remaining unauthorisedly absent from 12.10.2003 to 6.2.2004 Therefore, he was dismissed from service.

(2.) FEELING aggrieved, the workman sought reconciliation before the State Government. Since the reconciliation failed, the matter was referred to the Labour Court wherein it was numbered as Ref. No. 169/2008. After service of notice, the parties have filed their respective pleadings and on the basis of the pleadings, the Labour Court has framed the following issues: (i) Whether the DE held against the first party by second party is fair and proper? (ii) Whether the first party/claimant is guilty of the charges levelled against him? (iii) Whether the punishment imposed is proportionate? (iv) What order?