LAWS(KAR)-2002-6-26

K W GANAPATHY Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Decided On June 11, 2002
K.W.GANAPATHY Appellant
V/S
STATE OF KARNATAKA Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) GOVERNMENT Advocate takes notice for the State.

(2.) THE petitioner is the owner of a Zen car bearing No. KA-12-N-4699. The said car was stolen by the accused. On a complaint the police have registered a case and laid a charge-sheet in C. C. No. 269/2000 on the file of the Prl. JMFC, Virajpet. The prosecution version supports the contention of the petitioner that he is the owner of the car and was the subject matter of theft. The case is pending trial. The interim custody of the car was given to the petitioner under Section 457, Cr. P. C. by the JMFC, on certain conditions. The chief condition being that the petitioner shall keep the car in his custody intact and shall not alienate until the disposal of the case. After taking interim custody, the petitioner made another application before the JMFC submitting that the petitioner has taken finance from the Co-operative Bank while purchasing the car, the interest liability is mounting up and he is unable to make arrangements for repayment of the loan. Therefore, intends to sell the car for repaying the debt liability to the bank. In that connection, sought permission of the Court to permit him to sell the car. The trial Court rejected the request. In Crl. Revision Petition No. 13/2002, the Sessions Judge Kodagu, confirmed the order of the JMFC and rejected the revision. Being aggrieved the present petition is filed.

(3.) ACCORDING to the material discussions made in the impugned orders, it appears that there are three accused in the criminal case and accused Nos. 2 and 3 are in judicial custody. Accused No. 1 is absconding. Perhaps the case against accused No. 1 is likely to be split up. Even assuming the case against accused Nos. 2 and 3 is expeditiously concluded, for want of other accused split up charge-sheet would be pending and the petitioner has to suffer the restrictions of the conditional order prohibiting alienation till the disposal of the case. It is not known when the absconding accused is likely to be traced and the trial against him will be concluded. The indefinite and uncertain situation pestering the complainant prompted him to make an application to permit him to alienate the car.