LAWS(KAR)-2011-1-141

C. CHOWRI S/O LATE CHINNADORAI Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, THE TAHASILDAR AND SRI MUNIYAPPA S/O LATE POTHLAPPA

Decided On January 19, 2011
C. Chowri S/O Late Chinnadorai Appellant
V/S
State Of Karnataka Represented By Its Secretary Department Of Revenue, The Tahasildar And Sri Muniyappa S/O Late Pothlappa Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) WRIT Petitioner claiming to be owner of an extent of 2 acres of agricultural land in Sy. No. 100/P12 of Arasanahalli Pedanahalli Village, Kundana Hobli, Doddaballapura Taluk, on the basis of a sale transaction dated 23.4.2007 executed by one Shivanand N. Kalburgi, is aggrieved that the Tahsildar, Devanahalli Taluk, at the instance of the third Respondent who it appears had given some application/representation for recognizing his rights in an extent of 2 acres of land in Sy. No. 100/P8, having nevertheless, ordered the name of the third Respondent to be shown in the revenue records in respect of Sy. No. 100/12 and the Petitioner being aggrieved by this change in the revenue record, has approached this Court for the following relief: Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari in quashing the impugned order dated 9.8.2010 in MR No. 2/2010 -11 vide Annexure -G passed by the second Respondent insofar as it relates to the land bearing Sy. No. 100/P12 measuring 2 acres of Arasanahalli Peddanahalli Village, Kundana Hobli, Devanahalli Taluk.

(2.) SRI . Dayanand, learned Counsel for the Petitioner has vehemently urged that the Tahsildar has acted without any rhyme or reason; that when the third Respondent had sought for recognition of his rights in respect of Sy. No. 100/P8 and as a person belonging to scheduled caste community, there was no occasion for the Tahsildar to displace the Petitioner from the revenue records in respect of land in Sy. No. 100/P12; that the order is patently illegal and liable to be quashed etc.,.

(3.) THOUGH learned Counsel for the Petitioner has not made any submission, it transpires that the said order of the Assistant Commissioner is subject matter of further appeal before the Deputy Commissioner in proceedings No. LNDSC:ST[A]3/2010 -11 and there are certain interim orders also passed in this regard and the matter is pending before the Deputy Commissioner.