(1.) THIS Court is reluctantly remitting the matter to the Land Tribunal for fresh disposal for the following reasons;
(2.) MR . Bhat, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners vehemently submits that there is divergent opinion amongst the members inasmuch as two of the members would record a finding that the respondent is not a tenant and two of the members would record that he is a tenant. Indeed, the Chairman has exercised his casting vote in favor of the members who have accepted the application. He further submits that the impugned order is not a speaking order and most of the documents have been misread.
(3.) I have perused the petition papers as well as the records.