(1.) ALL these HRRPs are intetconnected. The first HRRP is filed by the tenant in HRC No. 1605/93 to challenge the order thereon dated 17- 1-98 on the file of the XVI Additional Small Causes Judge, barigalore City. The second HRRP is filed by the landlord in HRC no. 1602/93 on the file of the Court of Small Causes Judge (SCCH no. 4) Bangalore City, dated 1. 10. 1999 in so far as the same related to rejection of the eviction petition in respect of a larger part of the petition schedule shop premises, and in the like manner, the third hrrp is filed by the tenant in the said HRC No. 1602/93 in so far as the same related to his eviction from the smaller part of the petition shop schedule premises, both the parts being in 'l' shape.
(2.) THE brief facts of the case are as follows:
(3.) THE parties henceforth are referred to as landlord-firm' and the tenant/tenants as they were before the trial Court for convenience.