(1.) IN these two revision petitions presented under section 23 (1) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957, the following question of law arises for consideration :
(2.) IN order to appreciate the above question of law, it is necessary to set out the relevant portion of section 8-A of the Act. It reads :
(3.) THE contention of the petitioner, however, before the authorities and the Tribunal has been that the notification did not fall under section 8-A (1) (a) of the Act and, therefore, it cannot be said that the notification stood automatically cancelled with effect from March 15, 1980, by virtue of sub-section (3-A) of section 8-A of the Act. This contention has been rejected by the Tribunal. Aggrieved by the said order, the petitioner has presented these two revision petitions.