VITTAL Vs. VITTAL

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The appellant-claimant has preferred this appeal aggrieved by the impugned judgment and award dated 31/3/2012 passed in MVC No.351/2011 on the file of the learned Senior Civil Judge and Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bailhongal (for short referred to as "the Tribunal"), whereunder the claim petition filed by the claimant was allowed in part directing respondent No.1-insured to pay the compensation of Rs.73,250/- with interest @ 6% p.a.

(2.) Heard the learned counsel for the appellant Sri.Hanmant R.Latur and Sri. M.G.Gadgoli, learned counsel for respondent No.2-Insurance Company. Respondent No.1-insured remained absent inspite of service of notice.

(3.) Brief facts of the case before the tribunal is as follows: