VISHWANATH Vs. CHIDAMBARA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard learned Counsel for the Appellant. None appears for the caveators Respondents though the matter was called twice.

(2.) Submission of Sri G.R. Mohan, learned Counsel for the Appellant is that the Trial Court dismissed the petition filed by the Appellant under Section 264(1) of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 and the only reason for the Trial Court dismissing the petition is on account of the Appellant not leading any evidence though the Appellant had filed the affidavit in support of his case. Further, submission made is that, the Trial Court's order sheet does not indicate that the evidence of the Petitioner was closed but on the other hand, straight away the matter was posted for arguments when the matter was actually posted for evidence on 21-11-2009. Under the said circumstances, the order of the Court below be set aside and the Appellant be given an opportunity to lead evidence in support of his case.

(3.) The above submission of the Appellant's Counsel finds ample support from the order sheet of the Trial Court which has been produced at Annexure-II. The matter was listed for evidence by an order dated 4-11-2009 and was posted to 21-11-2009. But on the said date i.e., on 21-11-2009, there was no order of the Court indicating that the evidence of the Appellant was closed. But on the other hand, straight away the matter was posted for arguments.