REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

ABDUL WAJID Appellant

V/S

A.S.ONKARAPPA Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

NEMICHAND TAVANAPPA KUDACHI V. JINNAPPA MAHADEV KUDACHI [REFERRED TO]
GURUVIAH V. KRISHNAVENAMMA [REFERRED TO]
M/S. KHANDELWAL BROTHERS AND CO. LTD. V. G.S. NISAR AHMED. [REFERRED TO]
DURGADAS PURKAYASTHA V. HON'BLE GAUHATI HIGH COURT. [REFERRED TO]
B.S. GIRIDHAR V. P.V. SHETTI [REFERRED TO]
BANGALORE PRINTING & PUBLISHING CO. LTD. V. SOWCAR T. PREMNATHE. [REFERRED TO]
JUGALKISHORO SARAF VS. RAW COTTON COMPANY LIMITED [REFERRED TO]
LALA SHRI BHAGWAN VS. RAM CHAND [REFERRED TO]
TRIBHOVANDAS PURSHOTTAMDAS THAKKAR VS. RATILAL MOTILAL PATEL [REFERRED TO]
M C CHOCKALINGAM VS. V MANICKAVASAGAM [REFERRED TO]
SUNDARJAS KANYALAL BHATIJA PRAHALAD HIRANAND ADVANI VS. COLLECTOR THANE MAHARASHTRA:COLLECTOR THANE MAHARASHTRA [REFERRED TO]
SUNDARJAS KANYALAL BHATIJA PRAHALAD HIRANAND ADVANI VS. COLLECTOR THANE MAHARASHTRA:COLLECTOR THANE MAHARASHTRA [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF TRIPURA VS. TRIPURA BAR ASSOCIATION [REFERRED TO]
RAPTAKOS BRETT AND COMPANY LIMITED VS. GANESH PROPERTY [REFERRED TO]
PRADIP CHANDRA PATNAIK VS. PRAMOD CHANDRA PATNAIK [REFERRED TO]
P RAMACHANDRA RAO VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA [REFERRED TO]
GIRIDHAR B S VS. P V SHETTY [REFERRED TO]
RAMESH P SETH VS. M S KRISHNA MURTHY [REFERRED TO]
BANGALORE PRINTING AND PUBLISHING CO LTD VS. SOUKAR T PREMNATH [REFERRED TO]
SAROJAMMA VS. K M VENKATESH [REFERRED TO]
SAROJAMMA VS. K M VENKATESH [REFERRED TO]
ABDUL WAJID VS. A S ONKARAPPA [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The controversy which led to this reference for the opinion of the full bench relates to the jurisdiction of Courts of Small Causes constituted under Karnataka Small Cause Courts Act 1964 (for short KSCC Act) to take cognizance of the suits for ejectment by the land lord against the tenants in respect of the premises to which the provisions of Karnataka Rent Act 1999 (for short KR Act) are not applicable, and the lease of such premises having either been determined by efflux of time limited thereby or having been determined by a notice in accordance with law or the permission to occupy the premises having been withdrawn.

(2.) This controversy arose on account of the conflicting decisions rendered by Learned Single Judges in three different judgments and another learned single judge expressing the view that the interpretation placed by the Division Bench in Smt. Sarojamma v. K.M. Venkatesh, 2007 ILR(Kar) 3309 on Article 4 of Schedule to KSCC Act and the declaration of law that;

(3.) The legislative backdrop:

Click here to view full judgment.

ABDUL WAJID Vs. A S ONKARAPPA

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address