LAWS(KAR)-2010-12-26

KARNATAKA STATE ELECTION COMMISSION Vs. G SANGAPPA

Decided On December 03, 2010
KARNATAKA STATE ELECTION COMMISSION, BANGALORE Appellant
V/S
SRI G. SANGAPPA Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Respondent No. 1 approached this Court by filing W.P. No. 36337 of 2010, wherein, he assailed a notification issued by the State Election Commission dated 08.11.2010 ("Annexure-A", to the instant writ appeal). Through the aforesaid notification, the State Election Commission had earmarked constituencies category-wise for purposes of reservation. The reservation made were not only for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Backward Classes, but also for Women. The remaining constituencies were to be filled up without any reservation. The claim of Respondent No. 1 before this Court was, that the reservation contemplated under the Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Panchayat Raj Act'), read with the provisions of the Karnataka Panchayat Raj (Reservation of Seats in Taluk Panchayats and Zilla Panchayats by Rotation) Rules, 1998 (hereinafter referred to as the Reservation by Rotation Rules, 1998), have to be in consonance with the mandate of reservation contained in Article 243D of the Constitution of India. The pointed submission at the hands of Respondent No. 1, during the course of writ proceedings was, that the "rotation" in the matter of "reservation" contemplated under the aforesaid provisions had not been given effect to, through the impugned notification dated 08.11.2010.

(2.) W.P. No. 36337 of 2010 came to be disposed of by an order dated 25.11.2010. In sum and substance, the learned Single Judge arrived at the conclusion, that the notification depicting reservations was not sustainable, in terms of the mandate of Section 162 of the Panchayat Raj Act. It was sought to be contended, that the reservation contemplated through the impugned notification had merely provided for "reservation", by alternating between Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, and not in terms of the mandate of Section 162(3) of the Panchayat Raj Act, by "rotation" amongst all the reserved categories.

(3.) Through the instant writ appeal, the Karnataka State Election Commission has impugned the order passed by the learned Single Judge dated 25.11.2010, disposing of W.P. No. 36337/10 (and other connected writ petitions).