B. KAVITHA W/O VENKOBA RAO Vs. SRI. VENKOBA RAO S/O LATE PARASURAMA RAO AND SMT. SAROJA BAI W/O LATE PARASURAMA RAO

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THERE is delay of 37 days in filing this criminal revision petition.

(2.) THIS revision petition is by the complainant before the learned Magistrate. Complainant had filed a complaint under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act. In the said application, she had also claimed for shared house. The trial Court by order dated 19.9.2009 had directed the respondents to provide shared house bearing Nos. 47, 1st floor, 1st Cross, Vivekanandanagar, Jai Bharathi Nagar, Bangalore. The said order was called in question by the 2nd respondent before the Fast Track Court -III in Criminal Appeal No. 25113/2009. The Appellate Court found that, the property against which the direction is issued, is exclusively belongs to the respondent No. 2 - mother -in -law and such property cannot be treated as shared house for the purpose of providing residential accommodation to the aggrieved party. Accordingly, it modified the order of the learned Magistrate and directed the husband to provide residential accommodation to the complainant and insofar as direction to provide house in property bearing No. 47, 1st floor, 1st cross, Vivekananda Nagar, Bangalore, is concerned, same is set aside.

(3.) I do not find any error in the order of the Lower Appellate Court. Accordingly application LA No. 1/10 for condonation of delay is rejected. Consequently, this revision petition is also dismissed.