(1.) Leave granted.
(2.) The appeal is directed against the judgment and order of the Punjab and Haryana high Court dated 27th April, 1999. The high Court in the impugned judgment without even indicating the facts, disposed of the matter following its earlier decision in the case of Arun Kumar and ors. v. State of Haryana [in C. W. P. No. 8180/97]. In Arun Kumar's case on the basis of the concession made by the counsel appearing for the Municipal council that vacancies exist, the Court had passed certain orders and issued direction to accommodate the petitioners on ad hoc vacancies, to be regularised thereafter in accordance with the seniority.
(3.) In the present case, in the High Court itself on behalf of the Municipal Council, a counter-affidavit had been filed indicating therein that a scheme has been prepared for absorption of the employees like the petitioners keeping in view their seniority in question. We really fail to understand how the High Court disposed of the matter following the decision in Arun kumar's case where a counsel appearing for the Municipal Council has made the concession in question.