(1.) We have before us these three Interlocutory Applications Nos. 1 to 3 filed for "clarification" by the State of Punjab in Civil Appeal Nos. 3792-94 of 1989 (Ajit Singh Januja v. State of Punjab) (1996) 2 SCC 715 : (1996 AIR SCW 1196 : AIR 1996 SC 1189 : 1996 Lab IC 1030) (hereinafter referred to as Ajit Singh in this judgment). The matter concerns a dispute relating to seniority of reserved candidates and general candidates.
(2.) At the outset we make it clear that in this judgment we are not concerned with the reservation policy of the State or with the validity of any procedure fixing roster points for purpose of promotion of reserved candidates. We are here dealing only with a limited question relating mainly to seniority of the reserved candidates promoted at roster points.
(3.) We also make it clear that what we are deciding today is based on principles already laid down by this Court since 1950 and in particular since 1963. Basing on those principles, we are concerned with the limited question as to whether Union of India v. Virpal Singh, (1995) 6 SCC 684 : (1995 AIR SCW 4309 : AIR 1996 SC 448) and Ajit Singh Januja v. State of Punjab, (1996) 2 SCC 715 : (1996 AIR SCW 1196 : AIR 1996 SC 1189 : 1996 Lab IC 1030) , which were earlier decided in favour of the general candidates are to be affirmed or whether the latter deviation made in Jagdish Lal v. State of Haryana, (1997) 6 SCC 538 : (1997 AIR SCW 2257 : AIR 1997 SC 2366 : 1997 Lab IC 2301) against the general candidates, is to be accepted.