STATE OF ORISSA Vs. ASIS RANJAN MOHANTY

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The respondent had entered into an agreement with the appellant for execution of the work of restoration of scoured bank of Balibandha and retired line to protect Naraj Weir, being Agreement No. 32 F-2 of 1976-77. The respondent did not complete the work within the extended time and did not fully execute the work according to the appellant. There were disputes between the parties.

(2.) According to the appellant, the respondent contractor wrote a letter dated 28-4-1977 in which the respondent stated that his total claim is rs 37,106. According to the appellant, at the request of the respondent, he was paid Rs 38,396 and a sum of Rs 3710 was withheld.

(3.) Ultimately on account of the disputes between the parties, the respondent, by his letter dated 15-9-1977, requested the Chief Engineer of the appellant to appoint an arbitrator under clause 23 of the contract which was a clause for reference of disputes between the parties to arbitration. Clause 23 of the contract reads as under: