STATE OF ORISSA Vs. B K ROUTRAY

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The only question which has been raised in this appeal pertains to the award of interest by the Arbitrator for the pre-reference period. The pre-reference period, in the present case, is from 31-3-1977 to 20-3-1980. This entire period is prior to coming into force of the Interest Act, 1978. The interest Act, 1978 came into force during the pendency of the reference and the award is made on 12-10-1982 when the Interest Act, 1978 was in force.

(2.) The short question is whether the Arbitrator in 1982, could have awarded interest for the pre-reference period in view of the provisions of the Interest Act, 1978, although the entire pre-reference period is prior to the coming into force of the Interest Act, 1978.

(3.) In this connection, our attention has been drawn to the decision of this Court in State of Orissa v. B. N. Agarwalla reported in (1997) 2 SCC 469 . In paragraph 18, this Court has held that interest cannot be given for the period prior to the coming into force of the Interest Act, 1978. This Court has also held that the decision in the case of Executive Engineer (Irrigation) v. Abhaduta Jena reported in (1988) 1 SCC 418 has not been overruled in so far as it deals with interest for the pre-reference period. This Court has upheld the view taken in Abhaduta Jena's case to the effect that in respect of pre-reference period, interest cannot be awarded in respect of the period not covered by the Interest Act, 1978. Our attention was also drawn to a decision in the case of State of Orissa v. Niranjan Swain reported in (1989) 4 SCC 269 where also this Court said that where reference to arbitration was made prior to the commencement of the Interest Act, 1978, Arbitrator is not empowered to grant interest for the period up to the date of submission of claim to arbitration.