REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

TRIJUGI NARAIN Appellant

V/S

Sankoo Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

VISWESWAR RAO V. STATE OF M.P. [REFERRED TO]
D.S. MERAMWALA BHAYAWALA V. BAI SHRI AMARBA JETHSURBHAI [REFERRED TO]
RAJENDRA SINGH V. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
MIRZA RAJA PUSHPAVATHI VIJAYARAN CAJAPATHI RAJ MANNE SULTAN BAHADUR RAJKUMAR PUSHAVATI VISWESWARA GAJAPATHI RAJ SHRIMATHI RANI PUSHAVATHI VIDYAVATHI DEVI VARU DIED RANI PUSHAVATHI LALITHA KUMARI DEVI DOWAGER VS. PUSHAVATHI VISWESWAR CAJAPATHIRAJ RAJKUMAR OF VIZIANAGRAM:MIRZA RAJA PUSHPAVATHI VIJAYARAM GAJAPATHI RAJ MANNE SULTAN BAHADUR :MIRZA RAJA PUSHPAVATHI VIJAYARAM GAJAPATHI RAJ MANNE SULTAN BAHADUR :MIRZA RAJA PU [REFERRED TO]
DALMIA DADRI CEMENT CO LIMITED DALMIA DADRI CEMENT LIMITED VS. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX:UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
KUNWAR SHRI VIR RAJENDRA SINGH KUNWAR SHRI VIR RAJENDRA SINGH VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
RAJAH VELUGOTI KUMARA KRISHNA YACHENDRA VARU VS. RAJAH VELUGOTI SARVAGNA KUMARA KRISHNA YACHENDRA VARU [REFERRED TO]
H H MAHARAJADHIRAJA MADHAV RAO JIVAJI RAO SGINDIA BAHADUR OF GWALIOR H H MAHARAJADHIRAJA MAHARANA SHRI BHAGWAT SINGHJI BAHADUR OF UDAIPUR COL H H BRARBANS SARAMAUR RAJA I RAJAGAN SIR PRATAP SINGH MALVENDRA BAHADUR COL RAJA SURINDER SINGH BAHADUR VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
SURJIT LAL CHHABDA VS. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX BOMBAY [REFERRED TO]
BHAIYA RAMANUJ PRATAP DEO VS. LALU MAHESHANUJ PRATAP DEO [REFERRED TO]
THAKORE SHRI VINAYASINHJI VS. KUMAR SHRI NATWARSINHJI [REFERRED TO]
REVATHINNALBALAGOPALA VARMA INDIRABAYI VS. HIS HIGHNESS SHRI PADMANABHA DASA BALA RAMA VARMA [REFERRED TO]
HIS HIGHNESS MAHARAJA PRATAP SINGH MAHARANI SAROJINI DEVI VS. HER HIGHNESS MAHARANI SAROJINI DEVI:UMA DEVI [REFERRED TO]
DRAUPADI DEVI VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
N PADMAMMA VS. S RAMAKRISHNA REDDY [REFERRED TO]
N. PADMAMMA VS. S. RAMAKRISHNA REDDY [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) These civil appeals arise out of common judgment and decree dated 12th September 2008 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Second Appeal No. 1930 of 1983 (Chandra Nath Kala (D) through LRs. v. Trijugi Narain (D) through LRs. and Others) and Second Appeal No. 2017 of 1983 (Sankoo and Another v. Trijugi Narain (D) through LRs and Others).

(2.) The issue raised in the present appeals relates to the nature of the property, that is, whether the perpetual leasehold rights in plot No. 16 (Old Plot No. 9), Chaukhandi Kydganj, Allahabad Nazul Plot ('the property' for short) was coparcenary joint Hindu family property or being a part of impartible estate of the State of Maihar, was clothed with the incidence of self-acquired and separate property.

(3.) In order to decide the controversy, we would record the facts in brief.

Click here to view full judgment.

TRIJUGI NARAIN Vs. SANKOO

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address