REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

Chandana Das Appellant

V/S

STATE OF WEST BENGAL Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

BEHRAM KHURSHID PESIKAKA V. STATE OF BOMBAY [REFERRED TO]
CHANDANA DAS (MALAKAR) V. STATE OF WEST BENGAL [REFERRED TO]
D A V COLLEGE BHATINDA VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [REFERRED TO]
HIS HOLINESS KESAVANANDA BHARATI SRIPADAGALVARU SHRI RAGHUNATH RAO GANPAT RAO N H NAWAB MOHAMMAD IFTIKHAR ALI KHAN SHETHIA MINING AND MANUFACTURING CORPORATION LIMITED THE ORIENTAL GOAL GO LIMITED VS. STATE OF KERALA:UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
AHMEDABAD ST XAVIERS COLLEGE SOCIETY VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [REFERRED TO]
OLGA TELLIS VAYYAPVRI KUPPUSAMI VS. BOMBAY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION:STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [REFERRED TO]
N AMMAD VS. MANAGER EMJAY HIGH SCHOOL [REFERRED TO]
SOCIETY OF ST JOSEPHS COLLEGE VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
TMA PAI FOUNDATION VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA [REFERRED TO]
BRAHMO SAMAJ EDUCATION SOCIETY VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL [REFERRED TO]
BAL PATIL VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF W B VS. SUKHBINDAR KAUR [REFERRED TO]
MANAGER, CORPORATE EDUCATIONAL AGENCY VS. JAMES MATHEW & ORS. [REFERRED TO]
JUSTICE K.S. PUTTASWAMY (READ.) VS. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) These appeals have been referred to a Three Judge Bench in view of a disagreement between T.S. Thakur, J. and R. Banumathi, J., reported as Chandana Das (Malakar) v. State of West Bengal, 2015 12 SCC 140. The facts that are necessary in order to decide these appeals are set out by Thakur, J. in his judgment as follows:

(2.) The question posed by Thakur, J. in paragraph 6 of the judgment was answered stating:

(3.) Banumathi, J. delivered a separate judgment disagreeing with these conclusions. She agreed with the Division Bench judgment of the Calcutta High Court, which had upset the Single Bench judgment of that Court, and held as follows:

Click here to view full judgment.

CHANDANA DAS Vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address