(1.) Leave granted.
(2.) Defendant in the suit is before us aggrieved by and dissatisfied with a judgment and order dated 12.01.2006 passed by a learned Single Judge of the High Court, Delhi in FAO No. 50 of 2005 whereby and whereunder an appeal preferred by him under Section 104 read with Order XLIII Rule 1(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure was dismissed.
(3.) The relationship between the parties hereto was landlord and tenant. Respondents-landlord filed a suit for eviction of the appellant from the suit premises. A prayer for recovery of arrears of rent was also made. The said suit was filed in the Original Side of the Delhi High Court. Appellant, indisputably, appeared before the Delhi High Court. Evidences had been adduced in the matter. The suit was listed for final hearing on 23.10.2003. The said suit, however, consequent upon issuance of a notification enhancing the pecuniary jurisdiction of the District Courts, was transferred to the Court of Additional District Judge, Delhi. On 13.2.2004, the learned Additional District Judge, Delhi passed the following order: