REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

V.K.JAIN Appellant

V/S

HIGH COURT OF DELHI Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

L.BANYVANRI LAL V. KUNDAN CLOTH MILLS LTD. [REFERRED TO]
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX BOMBAY VS. AMRITLAL BHOGILAL AND CO [REFERRED TO]
ISHWARI PRASAD MISRA VS. MOHAMMAD ISA [REFERRED TO]
GOJER BROS PRIVATE LIMITED VS. RATAN LAL SINGH [REFERRED TO]
NIRANJAN PATNAIK VS. SASHIBHUSAN KAR [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH VS. NANDLAL JAISWAL [REFERRED TO]
A M MATHUR VS. PRAMOD KUMAR GUPTA [REFERRED TO]
K P TIWARI VS. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
KASHI NATH ROY VS. STATE OF BIHAR [REFERRED TO]
BRAJ KISHORE THAKUR VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
KUBHAYAMMED VS. STATE OF KERALA [REFERRED TO]
K A JUDICIAL OFFICER VS. METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE [REFERRED TO]
ANJANI K VERMA VS. STATE OF BIHAR [REFERRED TO]
SAMYA SETT VS. SHAMBU SARKAR [REFERRED TO]
RAMESH CHANDER SINGH VS. HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA VS. NILKANTH SHRIPAD BHAVE [REFERRED TO]
RAM NATH MANDAL VS. JOJAN MANDAL [REFERRED TO]
PANCHANAN BANERJI VS. UPENDRA NATH BHATTACHARJI [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This appeal is directed against the order dated 14th July, 2003 passed by the High Court of Delhi in Criminal Misc. (M) No. 522 of 2003.

(2.) The appellant, a judicial officer of the Delhi Higher Judicial Service, is aggrieved by the remarks and strictures which have been passed by the High Court of Delhi against him. According to the appellant, the remarks were totally undeserved, unjustified, unmerited and unnecessary for deciding the issue involved in the case. In this appeal, he has prayed for expunging and deleting the remarks passed by the High Court.

(3.) Brief facts which are necessary to dispose of this appeal are recapitulated as under:

Click here to view full judgment.

V K JAIN Vs. HIGH COURT OF DELHI

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address