BHUP SINGH Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The appellant herein was an applicant for the post of Labour Inspector in the Labour Department of the State of Haryana. He was holding the post of Assistant in the same Department and he put forth the claim as eligible to be promoted to the post of Labour inspector. A total cadre strength of 44 posts of Labour Inspectors has been fixed. As per the relevant Rule, they were to be filled up by promotion as well as by direct recruitment in equal divisions. Reservation quota for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes and backward Classes has been fixed up as per the letter dated 9/2/1979, issued by the government. Out of that quota, 20% of the posts were reserved for members of the Scheduled Castes alone. It is not necessary to refer to the other quota for the other classes, since that is not material now and the only claim of the appellant is that since he belongs to a Scheduled Caste, he should have been one of the promotees. A roster was formulated containing 100 points indicating the posts against which the appointments were to be made. The grievance of the appellant is that when Point No. 68 in the roster was earmarked for a member of a Scheduled Caste, that vacancy was filled up from General category and thereby upset the appellant's right to get promoted. If the roster had been followed, the appellant would have been the right candidate for filling up that vacancy, which tallied with Roster Point no. 68 according to the appellant. With the aforesaid contentions, he approached the High court of Punjab and Haryana with a writ petition, but a division bench of the High court dismissed the writ petition by the impugned order.

(2.) The stand adopted by the government of Haryana and the other respondents is the following:

(3.) Learned counsel for the appellant contended that in view of the legal position elucidated by this court in Prabhash Chand Jain v. State of haryana roster points should have been taken into consideration while filling up the vacancies irrespective of the question whether candidates belonging to the reserved categories have already been selected or not. The question involved in that case was whether the government is entitled to issue a circular that, when there are only two posts, reservation policy need not be implemented. In that context, learned Judges observed that such a letter ought not have been issued by the government and vacancies should have been filled up according to the roster points.