UNION OF INDIA Vs. BHOLA DUTT PANDEY

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This appeal by special leave is preferred against the judgment of Madhya Pradesh High Court, Jabalpur Bench, dated 6-3-1990 in M. P. No. 823 of 1988.

(2.) The respondent was employed after retirement from military service in the service of Indo Tibetan Border Police (ITBP) by order dated 3-11-1979. Under the terms and conditions of the said employment offer, it was expressly stipulated that his service will be governed by Rule 16 of the CRPF Rules and that other conditions of service will be governed under the provisions of the Central Reserve Police Force Act and Rules. It is also stated in the order of employment in para 5 as follows:

(3.) Accepting the terms and conditions, the respondent joined the ITBP Service.