LAWS(SC)-1998-3-90

GOA CENTRAL COOPERATIVE CONSUMERS Vs. BHAGWANT NARAYAN TENDULKAR

Decided On March 17, 1998
GOA CENTRAL COOPERATIVE CONSUMERS Appellant
V/S
BHAGWANT NARAYAN TENDULKAR Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 7th July 1980 passed by the Bombay High Court, Goa Bench at Panaji in Special Civil Application (Writ Petition) No. 107 of 1974. The appellant, the Goa Central Co-operative Consumers wholesale and Retail Stores Ltd., Panaji made an application under Section 91 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 against the respondents for claim of money flowing from a hire purchase agreement entered between the said co-operative society and the respondents. Under such agreement the society had transferred three truck to the respondents on a hire purchase basis.

(2.) The respondents raised the dispute that the proceeding under Section 91 of the Co-operative Societies Act before the Registrar of the Co-operative Societies was not maintainable. Such contention, however, was overruled by the Registrar. Thereafter, the aforesaid writ petition was moved before the Goa Bench of the Bombay High Court by the respondents. By the impugned judgment the High Court has held that such dispute was not maintainable under the provisions of Section 91 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. The High Court has indicated that the hire purchase agreement entered between the society and the respondents was not made in the course of the usual business of the society. In any event, the said agreement of hire purchase did not come under clause (c) of Section 91(1) of the said Act.

(3.) In our view, the High Court has rightly held in the facts of the case, that the hire purchase agreement between the respondents and the co-operative society was not made in the course of the usual business of the society. That apart, even if it is assumed that such business transaction by way of hire purchase had taken place between the society and a non member of the society, in order to bring the dispute under Section 91 of the said Act, the transaction in question must come within the purview of Sections 43, 44 or Section 45 of the said Act. Section 43 deals with restrictions on borrowings of the society Section 44 deals with regulation of loan making policy and the said sections are not at all attracted in the facts of the case. Section 45 deals with restriction on the transaction with non-members. It will be appropriate at this stage to refer to Section 45.