(1.) Special leave granted.
(2.) The first respondent filed a claim statement before the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Gurgaon, which was in the form of the demand notice that he had issued to the appellant. It stated thus:
(3.) It is necessary immediately to analyse what the first respondent's claim was. It was:(1) that he had been appointed as an Octroi Moharrir. (2) that he had been performing the duties of a Moharrir; (3) that the appellant had wanted him to work as Octroi peon; (4) that he had refused to perform the duties of an Octroi peon because he had been appointed as a Moharrir, and (5) that he be reinstated as Octroi Moharrir.